Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
Early in my career, the company I was with downsized and asked the ~30 of us to decide who stayed or left. The reasoning was that those ready to leave could raise their hand and help their friends stay. You're a founder—what do you think of this approach?
9 replies
2 recasts
13 reactions
Linda Xie
@linda
Personally not a fan of it at all, think founders should be opinionated and decisive with big decisions like this + creates guilt/tension among employees
1 reply
0 recast
16 reactions
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
This ain’t survivor 😭 these are people lives you’re playing with. Would’ve left regardless of whether my colleagues picked me or not. Horrible way to downsize. Sounds like the founder felt so much guilt that it overrode their senses for picking the actual valuable ppl to stay
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Jess Sloss !!!
@jess
Chicken shit move from leadership.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ayo Of Asgard
@ayomide.eth
The ugly side of being an employee :(
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
McBain
@mcbain
Cowards
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zach Davidson
@zd
Awful approach IMO. It’s the founder’s job to hire and fire. Simple as that. If you can’t/won’t do that when you need to, don’t be a founder.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
Not a fan, founders should take responsibility for their companies rather than deflecting to their employees If they were in the unfortunate spot where they had to downsize, it's up to them to figure out how to navigate that in the best way possible given the circumstances
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SydneyJason
@sydneyjason
This is super complex but also a very mature way to do it. Not talked about: having the wrong people to stay after a layoff can be insanely toxic to the culture…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
What do people think about this case from Matt Mullenweg https://ma.tt/2024/10/alignment/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
