Tiago on Warpcast

Tiago pfp

@alvesjtiago.eth

based on a thread from @purple discord between @0xgeist and @ccarella regarding the farcaster apps landscape, trying to visualize it based on farapps.farcase.xyz data. quick poll. both graphs convey the same information. which one do you think is more informative: 1. top 2. bottom https://i.imgur.com/oUUru3h.png

12 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

geist pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter Kim pfp

Is this showing number of apps in each category? Assuming it is, but might make it more clear to be explicit on the graph. Prefer top graph. btw, congrats to Portugal on advancing in the World Cup! Please go easy on South Korea on Friday :)

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

max ⚡ pfp

2, but use different shades at least!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Brenner pfp

Neither is good. Just a bar graph would be better

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Les Greys pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

moreReese pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chaotic Neutral pfp

Chaotic Neutral

Top is more dramatic, bottom is more precise. The problem is that having a pie chart with each slice having the same hue implies that there is only one category. If it were me, I’d have a pie with different colored slices.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Bethany Crystal pfp

Bethany Crystal

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Aman Johar pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Top graph is known to be bad info viz. The area of the thing is dependent on (arbitrary) ordering of the categories. You can easily lie with that sort of visualization. Category: A B C D E F G H Thing 1: 10 9 8 7 4 3 2 1 Thing 2: 4 10 3 9 2 8 1 7 Thing 1 and 2 are "equally good" but Thing 1 *looks* way better.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Sound Motives pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Derek pfp

Top by a mile - much easier to visually digest, even at a quick glance. Simply more visually appealing, too, imo

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction