Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
one thing i'm pretty impressed by with content on farcaster so far is that we haven't really seen the emergence of explicitly nsfw/adult content, ie porn is the fc crowd just too sophisticated/elevated or "christian rap" re: sex (but not ponzis)? or is πΎ applying really strong filters against sex focused content? i ask not because i want more porn here, but mainly because being on the internet for nearly 3 decades has "taught" me that rule #34 is real and is, for better or worse, a sub communal sign that you have a robust social network (re: search engines, 4chan, reddit, twitter, etc.) maybe i'm just too degenerate? π« what do other old hat terminally online people on here think?
6 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
matter of time
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
Only a matter of time, no successful social network platform can be devoid of that, we are after all humans
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sarah Akwisombe
@sarahakwisombe
so what you're saying is there is a gap in the market....
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
J Finn π©
@jdotfinn
dwr has said that they are very careful about launching video, as I think you still basically need a powerbadge to cast video organically. I think this probably helps, and they must have good AI Detectors for images.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
O+<
@spitfunkolips
I think youβre right, not enough users (yet) only nsfw posts I see are great photography posts and Iβm enjoying it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
Compared to what I see on Twitter, farcaster is a saint and i really appreciate that
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
