Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
one thing i'm pretty impressed by with content on farcaster so far is that we haven't really seen the emergence of explicitly nsfw/adult content, ie porn is the fc crowd just too sophisticated/elevated or "christian rap" re: sex (but not ponzis)? or is 🚾 applying really strong filters against sex focused content? i ask not because i want more porn here, but mainly because being on the internet for nearly 3 decades has "taught" me that rule #34 is real and is, for better or worse, a sub communal sign that you have a robust social network (re: search engines, 4chan, reddit, twitter, etc.) maybe i'm just too degenerate? 🫠 what do other old hat terminally online people on here think?
6 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
Sarah Akwisombe
@sarahakwisombe
so what you're saying is there is a gap in the market....
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
less an observation on market, more on my years of experience aimlessly being on the web 😂 rule 34 essentially posits that if you spend enough time on the internet all browsing eventually lead to porn; and on most "big" social networks i've found this to be true so my guess is we'll know FC has made it when we start seeing NSFW content, which in a way is a "gap in the market?" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_34
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction