1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
20 replies
4 recasts
133 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
31 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
That issue is simple: web for now, you'll see later.
But here's my thinking on the potential, no matter the choice:
HUGE RISKS
- the strategy for FC + Warp is unclear; 2 years ago you had FC + clients (including Warpcast), now the official FC website is a Warp billboard
- history (Twitter) showed us that strategy can change as a company grows, so they can cut access to API (huge risk!)
- I asked DWR even 1+ years ago, if he doesn't feel that an all-dev-team is a risk for the project due to a lack of perspective; maybe then it wasn't, but looking at some of their recent decisions (priority mode, remove basic features, etc) I think it will have an increasing negative impact
HUGE OPPORTUNITIES
- the Warpcast app is lacking many core features already confirmed on other platforms (long form content, media - video + pics, gifs, now animated pfps, nft pfps, scheduling, drafts, etc)
⬇️ 2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction