Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Its possible we should reframe The Burn as The Great Public Goods Distribution — the mechanics are the same, but gut reaction from onlookers probably isnt
10 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
The Great Public Goods Burn? burning itself is a public good to all eth holders but we also expect if we really haven’t reached consensus by the burn date that a lot of public goods donation props will be pouring in. doesn’t seem like too much of a stretch?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
i like keeping the word “burn” but agree it is repeatedly causing a not great “burning is wasteful and stupid” reaction and maybe this type of framing can help ppl think twice? @wilsoncusack thoughts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
krel
@krel
the burn mech is the input, public goods funding the output (ideally) anyone who think the burn itself is the endgoal will struggle to see why its good imo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
I kinda like “multiplayer slashing” or some such. I don’t think we want to lose that it is intended to be a punishment/incentive.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
krel
@krel
agree but also, internally dont think it will matter much
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
But even for public branding. It doesn’t make sense to call it like “the great public goods giveaway” when in fact it is just adding an incentive that is supposed to be painful so that the DAO will allocate resources.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
this is a good point. but help us manage the pr disaster here wilson!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
