Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Its possible we should reframe The Burn as The Great Public Goods Distribution — the mechanics are the same, but gut reaction from onlookers probably isnt
10 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
The Great Public Goods Burn? burning itself is a public good to all eth holders but we also expect if we really haven’t reached consensus by the burn date that a lot of public goods donation props will be pouring in. doesn’t seem like too much of a stretch?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
i like keeping the word “burn” but agree it is repeatedly causing a not great “burning is wasteful and stupid” reaction and maybe this type of framing can help ppl think twice? @wilsoncusack thoughts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
krel
@krel
the burn mech is the input, public goods funding the output (ideally) anyone who think the burn itself is the endgoal will struggle to see why its good imo
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
I kinda like “multiplayer slashing” or some such. I don’t think we want to lose that it is intended to be a punishment/incentive.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
krel
@krel
agree but also, internally dont think it will matter much
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction