Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/math
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
P = NP is in fact an easy problem. It has several solutions: * P = 0 * N = 1 * N = integer > 1, P = "turn right 360/(N-1) degrees" * N = integer > 1, P = any idempotent (eg. "erase everything at a particular location") Most people who think they understand the truth about P = NP have only grasped the first two.
10 replies
22 recasts
168 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
BKim
@brittkim.eth
funny
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joshua Salles
@omghax.eth
Vitalik posting multiple times on the same day on Farcaster?! 🥹 love to see it!
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
helladj
@helladj
Idk imma just press “like”
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
[email protected]
🎩
@mikesylphdapps
The professor who taught me about NP completeness had this kind of dry wit about it too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
YungSB.eth 🔴✨
@yungsb
I love when you’re talking about mathematics, numerology, letters, the protocol, Greek history, 13, etc. because of a lot of ppl don’t know what you’re talking about, but I do & it’s as you said in the last statement of this post most people who think they understand the truth have only grasped the first two.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Owen Campbell
@meatballs
As is so often the case - those who consider themselves to be expert have yet to discover the true depth of their ignorance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✿ ZACH HARRIS ✿
@zachharris.eth
But can they handle the truth about the second two? What are the implications or applications for them sir?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leonardo
@elleemme
The price action is the problem man
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghost 🎩
@ghostbo4.eth
what are u onto V ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
