Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Excited to see work on solar geoengineering: https://twitter.com/MazMHussain/status/1775705471078293875 Maybe global-south nations who will be most hit by climate change will start threatening to do this unilaterally; even if other techniques are ultimately better, perhaps they need the push to get to the finish line
39 replies
363 recasts
1903 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
"Climate change will make the earth inhospitable for human life" and "but we can't solve it THAT WAY!" are fundamentally incompatible notions. If a patient has a cold, you give them tea and natural remedies. If a patient has cancer, you give them chemotherapy.
3 replies
2 recasts
55 reactions

kripcat.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
kripcat.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@kripcat.eth
Think this is a bad analogy. The patient is overweight and smokes with a history of heart disease. The solution is to eat right, quit and exercise; not to medicate to facilitate a self destructive lifestyle.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Nerd-E ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ฎ  pfp
Nerd-E ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ฎ
@nerdy
Geoengineering seems far more likely to make things worse with unintended consequences, than it is to succeed. At least when it comes to methods that mess with sunlight in the atmosphere. Sunlight is important usable energy. The problem is trapped waste heat, the focus should remain on that.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Andi pfp
Andi
@0xandi
Argumentation from analogy is weak in general, if itโ€™s a false analogy like this one itโ€™s a fallacy. Not every cancer is treated with chemo, you weigh off the destructive impact with the potential outcome. What you ALWAYS do is stop taking the cancerogenic immediately or no chemo in the world will save you
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction