Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Andrej K makes an interesting point and Autism Capital's dismissive reply is wrong. It is rational to be more afraid of man than of nature, because it is rational to be afraid of powerful optimizers. This is also often why we are more suspicious of for-profit versions than non-profit versions of the same activity.
38 replies
193 recasts
970 reactions

pourteaux pfp
pourteaux
@px
i wonder if the threat is less about man vs nature, and more about algorithmatized vs natural
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kiran pfp
Kiran
@neuroswish
I’m definitely more suspicious of non profit versions of things than for profit versions - the incentives are much harder to decipher
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
This is a virus vs poison type discussion I think “executable” should be reserved for code-like things. One test is whether the response is strongly dose dependent. Code copies beyond a few have no extra effect but more poison (or bullets or laser power) kills you faster. Language is in-between.
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
In a similar way, the concentrated or distilled version of something can often be much more dangerous than the naturally occurring version
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Matt Huang pfp
Matt Huang
@matthuang
Snow crash has some good exploration of this idea… the “nam-shub of Enki”
0 reply
0 recast
14 reactions

Jason — ⚪↑🎩🐹 pfp
Jason — ⚪↑🎩🐹
@jachian
There’s an ounce of truth in Autism Capital’s response, but what he gets wrong is that the world isn’t orienting around capturing your attention and holding it X’s feed is
1 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

Ben  🟪 pfp
Ben 🟪
@benersing
Interesting. Not sure I read it as dismissive or intending to be a mutually exclusive statement. What am I missing??
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

LONO 🎩🐹 pfp
LONO 🎩🐹
@lono.eth
Autism capital has gotten pretty bad about being a reply guy/yes man to every big red pilled right wing account on twitter at this point
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

BORED 🥱 pfp
BORED 🥱
@bored
Agreed. Nature does not have motives, it does not fear you.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

totty 🔥🧶 pfp
totty 🔥🧶
@totty.eth
autism capital is the fucking worst
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

kk pfp
kk
@king
That's called social engineering.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩 pfp
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@thepencil.eth
You have a link to the thread so I can read it in context?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jake Casey pfp
Jake Casey
@jakeacasey
I've always thought that this is why the 'creator economy' exists. Creators short-circuit that for-profit/non-profit bullshit detector.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dusan pfp
dusan
@ds8
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." also reminds me of this gem by epsilon theory https://www.epsilontheory.com/narrative-and-metaverse-pt-1-the-living-word/
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Most people find it hard to observe something without judging it immediately. Both posts are an observation. Also tech people using computer metaphors to explain the world to themselves and others will never stop being funny to me (in an endearing way, most of the times; except those times when it’s cringe af).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

frdysk 🦠 pfp
frdysk 🦠
@fufuprophet.eth
Sleep now
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sean Wince 🎩🐹🟢↑ pfp
Sean Wince 🎩🐹🟢↑
@seanwince
Now imagine those executables being coded not just by normal humans but also artificial agents that are 100x, 1000x more intelligent than any human
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

miro𓆣 pfp
miro𓆣
@miroyato
Andrej's thought is interesting yeah propaganda (nation level) and social engineering (individual level) have always been around under (though under various names) But what I hate about this is the thought that technologists will try to "solve it" with technology rather socially / culturally. Which would be terrible.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

grant 🌈 🎩 🐸 pfp
grant 🌈 🎩 🐸
@grunt.eth
I am much more skeptical of a man in the forest than a tree I understand the intention of a tree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction