Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Grats @dankrad @karalabe.eth you got me to interrupt my work on EIPs and make a twitter response that turned into an unscheduled poast đ https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/05/17/decentralization.html
37 replies
79 recasts
1286 reactions
PĂ©ter SzilĂĄgyi
@karalabe.eth
Thanks. In exchange let meg interrupt my shit-posting to write an EIP (brain-dump) :) https://x.com/peter_szilagyi/status/1791589527452336341
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It's an interesting proposal! I think the biggest challenge with this kind of approach is intentional "edge attacks" to try to split the network. So, suppose you have X+1 proposer slots in a row. You send a tx right on a slot boundary, and don't include it X+1 times. Half the network thinks your last block is censoring
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
And tries to fork away from it, the other half thinks you haven't crossed the line, and keeps building on it. And so you get two halves of the network (even if temporarily) going in different directions.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
PĂ©ter SzilĂĄgyi
@karalabe.eth
I'm unsure this is an attack though. If I am a malicious validator that try to mess with my own block, I could try and time the propagation to split the network, but the effect is that my block might get reorged out f 50%+ don't attest. If 50%+ does attest, the block remains. But I don't see a split here. 1/2
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
polarbeartoenail đ©
@polarbeartoenail
đ for you on jam.so
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
