Grats @dankrad @karalabe.eth you got me to interrupt my work on EIPs and make a twitter response that turned into an unscheduled poast 😀

Grats @dankrad @karalabe.eth you got me to interrupt my work on EIPs and make a twitter response that turned into an unscheduled poast 😀

https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/05/17/decentralization.html

Thanks. In exchange let meg interrupt my shit-posting to write an EIP (brain-dump) :)

Thanks. In exchange let meg interrupt my shit-posting to write an EIP (brain-dump) :)

https://x.com/peter_szilagyi/status/1791589527452336341

I'm unsure this is an attack though. If I am a malicious validator that try to mess with my own block, I could try and time the propagation to split the network, but the effect is that my block might get reorged out f 50%+ don't attest. If 50%+ does attest, the block remains. But I don't see a split here. 1/2

It's an interesting proposal! I think the biggest challenge with this kind of approach is intentional "edge attacks" to try to split the network. So, suppose you have X+1 proposer slots in a row. You send a tx right on a slot boundary, and don't include it X+1 times. Half the network thinks your last block is censoring

Hey, Péter. It is so soothing to be hearing from someone as knowledgeable and senior like you speaking out on the wrong paths Ethereum has taken. No matter how many jerks and idiots trying to silence you or put you down, you are the true hero of ETH.