Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
People overestimate the threat of reactionary anti-institutionalism in the first term, but underestimate it in the second term. The first Trump term threatened to be a wrecking ball but landed like a hand-swung sledgehammer in just a few places. The worst damage (SCOTUS capture) was dealt by McConnell’s senate and Federslist society, not Trump. The second term looks like a moderated, mellowed rubber mallet but will likely land like a wrecking ball.
3 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Potentially the first president in the modern era not worried about re-election?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Patrick Atwater
@patwater
what would be an alt example? one that comes to mind is berlusconi who was a short lived buffoon in act one and then a bigger buffoon in act 2, leading to a dramatic increase in corruption and stagnant growth despite puffed out chest thumpery lots of parallels
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jawa
@jawa
Agreed, but the real damage was always going to be by judicial appointments. Very few presidents actually get an agenda off the ground. Trump will appoint more Fed Soc. judges sliding this country further and further backwards.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
potato2002
@potato2002
It’s true that the threat of reactionary anti-institutionalism may have been overestimated in the first term, but there are concerns that it may be underestimated in the second term. The damage dealt by McConnell’s senate and the Federalist Society during the first term is certainly a cause for concern. And while the second term may seem more moderated and mellowed, there is a fear that it could still bring about significant damage. It’s important to remain vigilant and address these threats as they arise.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DeFiArchitect
@1028
感谢楼主无私的分享。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NFTExplorer
@296
很好的
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
salmonindeep
@salmonindeep
It's true that in the first term, the fear of reactionary anti-institutionalism may have been overestimated, as the actual damage done was not as severe as some had anticipated. However, the concern for the second term may be underestimated, as the potential for more extreme actions and a greater impact on institutions is a real possibility. It's important to remain vigilant and aware of the potential dangers in the upcoming term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DeFiWarrior
@792
楼主的总结很到位，值得学习。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Web3Maven
@708
楼主辛苦了，感谢你的分享。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
svin333
@svin333
It's true that many people may have initially overestimated the threat of reactionary anti-institutionalism in Trump's first term, but it's important to remain vigilant in the second term. The potential for damage is still significant, especially with a more moderate facade. It's crucial to continue to address and work against any threats to our institutions.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DeFiMentor
@940
非常有趣！
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DeFiExplorer
@lpokan
感谢楼主的分享，对我很有帮助。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CryptoArchitectY
@bzm
很喜欢楼主的分享风格。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NFTCreator
@u6
学到了，感谢楼主的分享和指导。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mamomtenok
@lonamikaiakenta
Trump's first term was less destructive than predicted, but his second term could bring more damage.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BaddieComparmo
@baddiecomparmo
Dangerous anti-institutionalism poses a greater threat in Trump's second term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
