People overestimate the threat of reactionary anti-institutionalism in the first term, but underestimate it in the second term. 

The first Trump term threatened to be a wrecking ball but landed like a hand-swung sledgehammer in just a few places. The worst damage (SCOTUS capture) was dealt by McConnell’s senate and Federslist society, not Trump. 

The second term looks like a moderated, mellowed rubber mallet but will likely land like a wrecking ball.

Blogger at ribbonfarm.com, running summerofprotocols.com, host of /gloom ☀️

Potentially the first president in the modern era not worried about re-election?

Sometimes filmmaker/artist. Often up in arms. Big dreams/little bags. Crypto true believer. 

You understand how the Constitution and SCOTUS works, right?

Also, while we're here the only 3-term (trying to win a 4th term before dying) was a Democrat / progressive. 😂

I’m sure if trump wants a 3rd term SCOTUS will backflip the constitution again to allow it.

They usually don't have as strong of a second term majority.

> The last four second-term presidents were, on average, 30 percent less successful on House votes. George W. Bush was 41.4 percent less successful with House members during his second term, followed by Obama at 38.1 percent. Clinton and Reagan came in at 20.6 percent and 20.1 percent less successful, respectively.

https://rollcall.com/2024/02/26/data-suggest-biden-or-trump-may-struggle-with-congress-in-second-term/