veri22
@veri22
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
26 replies
12 recasts
193 reactions
10 replies
34 recasts
341 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, we’ll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 20 replies
20 recasts
348 reactions
35 replies
107 recasts
781 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
6 replies
8 recasts
248 reactions
283 replies
4643 recasts
7940 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
22 replies
161 recasts
945 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
5 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
28 reactions
15 replies
1968 recasts
2898 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
12 replies
14 recasts
90 reactions