veri22
@veri22
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
26 replies
12 recasts
202 reactions
11 replies
34 recasts
154 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, we’ll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 20 replies
20 recasts
94 reactions
36 replies
113 recasts
807 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
6 replies
8 recasts
255 reactions
262 replies
4570 recasts
7857 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
22 replies
168 recasts
1020 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
5 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
15 replies
2011 recasts
2963 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
12 replies
4 recasts
18 reactions