Varun Srinivasan
@v
CRDT's might be one of the absolute worst names for a really good thing. Trying to write something describing our CRDT-based system and struggling. No sentence flows when you add CRDT to it.
12 replies
15 recasts
125 reactions
David Furlong
@df
coin a new term
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
It's in good company. MP3, NFT & ChatGPT all sound lame too.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
A - B - C Easy as CRDT 👀 https://youtu.be/J1PWLQkQEog?si=yRBYVo0jlgM9yzS1&t=16
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jtgi (@farcon)
@jtgi
ya.. shapiro screwed us all, but for fun: - converging data type 🥴 - eventually consistent data structures 🤥 - “thanks to our commutable data structures” 🫤 - “conflict free data structures were a key part to the design” 😐 I think conflict free ain’t bad. replicated aspect seems extra.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Lamportian flow types
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
David Furlong
@df
Replica
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth @Farcon
@eulerlagrange.eth
SyncRT? MergeDT?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Raymond
@rz
Sync + reconciliation engine has worked well for every time we’ve had to talk about it. 🥗
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian - q/dau
@maurelian.eth
I really think you should appropriate “the tangle”, no one remembers that other project anymore
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adnum🎩
@adnum
Reminds me of C-3PO does C-RDT inpire more?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Spaceman Spiff 🎩🔵🍖🤫
@spaceman-spiff
Can you find a catchy nick name to use for it? I couldn't imagine it would get any easier if you wrote out all the words 😁
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
I know it's an over-simplification, but perhaps referring to it as " the double-spend problem"? aka double-spend avoidance mechanism
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
