Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Elad
@el4d
Let's delegate or transfer several Nouns to Protocol Guild. Wdyt?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Elad
@el4d
More generally, we probably want to give "free access" to great public goods contributors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
since we want ppl to actually vote and be engaged with nouns, I think it might be better to imagine specific people. for example, would trent or tim who engaged with us in the past be willing to accept a noun if gifted?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
why not access the collective? More voices behind each noun is ultimately preferable, no?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
I don't know if PG is a multisig that can vote together? But also we haven't seen much success in groups voting together and would rather have someone passionate participate with their own voice
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g
@w-g
Nouncil ?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
while I love individual ppl in nouncil, as a voting group its legitimacy likely declined through season 2
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@toadyhawk.eth
Curious why you think Nouncil’s legitimacy has declined? No large democratic group has perfect governance ofc, but Nouncil is probably the only group meeting every single week to discuss and vote on nouns governance for the love of it.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@toadyhawk.eth
When concerns were raised earlier in the year about Nouncil tending to vote YES too often, @joel & I spearheaded honest discussion abt how to fix, made changes to the culture & the quorum & if anything, may have swung the pendulum a little far the other way. In my experience, active Nouncillors care a lot about Nouns.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
