Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Let's delegate or transfer several Nouns to Protocol Guild. Wdyt?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
More generally, we probably want to give "free access" to great public goods contributors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
since we want ppl to actually vote and be engaged with nouns, I think it might be better to imagine specific people. for example, would trent or tim who engaged with us in the past be willing to accept a noun if gifted?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
why not access the collective? More voices behind each noun is ultimately preferable, no?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
I don't know if PG is a multisig that can vote together? But also we haven't seen much success in groups voting together and would rather have someone passionate participate with their own voice
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ShinyZero pfp
ShinyZero
@shinyzero.eth
Agree, you’re more likely to see active participation when there’s clear ownership. Multi-sigs/dao ownership dilutes the incentive too much and adds a lot of friction and complexity to stuff that needs to be simple, like voting and giving feedback on props.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Nouncil ?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions