Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Thought Experiment: + Imagine all your AI tools (chat, cursor, etc) were embodied as one human "Intern" who worked remotely. + All of the interfacing and outputs are the same. + Rate of improvement is also the same. Let's say you have $1M in annual salary available to spend. What's max you would pay this Intern?
6 replies
1 recast
18 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
(I would pay this intern every penny we have available outside of the core team. And prob raise specifically to pay them more.)
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

antaur pfp
antaur
@antaur.eth
100K
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
uh are they good at their job or are they like AI tools now?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Yungchad pfp
Yungchad
@timiyanu007
If this AI-powered "Intern" delivers consistent output, learns faster than any human, and scales across tasks 24/7 with zero burnout, you’re no longer paying for labor—you’re paying for leverage. In that case, $1M/year might even feel like a bargain, especially if it compounds your business.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Zach pfp
Zach
@zd
1. quantify the marginal benefit they're bringing to your business 2. pay them that amount i think we'll start to see comp packages that are marked to revenue per employee - both human and AI - and it will be a power law distribution
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Goldy pfp
Goldy
@goldytalks
stop hacking into my Apple notes lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction