ted (not lasso)
@ted
i loved FC (and still do!) because it was an exciting web3 project that I could access w/o crazy crypto money. i was initially stoked about @purple — and then realized it feels just like other plutocratic DAOs where governance rights are bought, not earned. is $$ the best way for us to organize? what am i missing?
9 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
is bidding and buying an NFT the only way to become a Purple DAO member though? agree that the mission of Purple can be achieved through many different formats — if I don't like plutocracy, nothing is stopping me from doing it differently 😏 FWIW, still stoked about @purple and excited to be a community member
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
This is why Nouns introduced the Nouncil and started delegating votes to more builders. It takes time but that's how these nounish projects push for contributors to have a stronger voice and nos just whales.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
osama
@osama
fwiw, I helped spin it up and I have I (almost intentionally) not bid and bought a 🟪… really want to figure fair mechanism so contributors can be part of governance. so let’s figure this out
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
I imagine that at some point there will be “fractional shares” for DAOs!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
yes the daily auction is currently the only way to join. they’re using Zora’s new Nouns Builder that copies Nouns daily auctions + you build a sizable treasury quickly + you have highly interested (and hopefully motivated) members early on - it takes time - may take a long time for prices to be reasonable
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
