Ryan Selkis (d/acc) on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ryan Selkis (d/acc) pfp

Ryan Selkis (d/acc)

If the Tucker interview helps Congress block further weapons shipments to Ukraine and forces a peace process, is that a good thing or a bad thing? Curious for the vibe check on FC. (Anyone who's followed me for a while knows where I stand.)

14 replies

0 recast

11 reactions

Meg pfp

@meganmichelle.eth

A good thing. Journalism should push peace buttons.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp

Vitalik Buterin

A peace process of the type "stop helping Ukraine" people are advocating would very likely not survive the long term, because they don't have the stomach to set up meaningful disincentives against a round 3 of aggression another decade from now. (eg. NATO membership is an example of such a disincentive)

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Alex pfp

@asenderling.eth

It's a bad thing, in so far as it tells other countries that they will not receive support they deserve to fight off an invading tyrant should they denuclearize. This worsens nuclear proliferation which threatens humanity.

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Thomas pfp

@aviationdoctor.eth

Unfortunately, “forcing peace” at this stage really means “forcing UA to accept RU’s conditions”, which include keeping its territorial gains, demilitarizing UA, & guaranteeing no UA accession to NATO — all of which deny UA its sovereignty. The US withdrawing their support is bad unless UA signals otherwise

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Alik 🇺🇦 pfp

I’m impressed by the absence of empathy. russia uses all its 150 million people economy to subvert and destroy a sovereign nation. And u wanna U.S. to just let it go. Why then not trade with bloody ruzzian money? Reagan would spin in the coffin seeing GOP now.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️ pfp

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️

if it does lead to a peace process then good thing for sure

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Taye 🎩🔵 👽⛏️ pfp

Taye 🎩🔵 👽⛏️

War bad. Peace good.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Steven Leshinger 🎩 pfp

Steven Leshinger 🎩

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

oliver pfp

@oliverk120.eth

If Russia agrees to give back the territories it invaded it would be good.. but my guess the chance of this are pretty low

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Sid Gandhi pfp

the interview was new for us, but congress/cia already know what’s going on and whether it would actually lead to peace of course if they don’t want peace (totally plausible) then the interview wouldn’t help us anyways

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chris Biele ⌐◨-◨ 🎩 pfp

Chris Biele ⌐◨-◨ 🎩

It wasn’t a hard hitting interview, but it was interesting hearing Putin discuss things like scuppered peace talks and the Nordstream pipeline debacle. I think anything that slows the perpetual war machine can only be helpful for humanity

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

ng | 🎩↑ pfp

Doesn’t solve the problem in principle. Putin layed out clear what his eyes is on (open Russian Empire map 1796 and cross check with what he said in interview). Stop will be a released win. He added territory. Rinse and repeat in couple years.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Savage 🎩 pfp

The cure for free speech is more speech. If US congress starts taking its direction from Putin, we need a lot more people shouting.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Capt. Jack pfp

I don’t think circle-jerks generally end that way. 🙄

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction