Geopolitics

If the Tucker interview helps Congress block further weapons shipments to Ukraine and forces a peace process, is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Curious for the vibe check on FC.

(Anyone who's followed me for a while knows where I stand.)

It wasn’t a hard hitting interview, but it was interesting hearing Putin discuss things like scuppered peace talks and the Nordstream pipeline debacle.

I think anything that slows the perpetual war machine can only be helpful for humanity

photographer 📸, curious cat 🐱, learning and teaching |

co-founder /bcard | host /cymatics | 

getbcard.io 

Felt like he was trying hard not to piss him off, which undermined his ability to ask difficult questions. There was some push back when it came to Evan Gershkovich, but he should have been asking about alleged war crimes.

I guess it’s a fine line between respecting your guest and not getting poisoned at the airport

It somehow felt to me like Tucker *thought* he was satisfying his responsibility to be hard hitting and ask the tough questions, and didn't realize that the actual bar is like 100x higher than what he was doing.

Ukrainian who struggles to fight against the tyranny and corruption. Ether punk. 

Maybe providing weapons to defend is an invitation for further attacks from the east.

Why not only not provide Ukraine with weapons to defend, why not attack Ukraine on the other side?