Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan Selkis (d/acc)
@tbi
If the Tucker interview helps Congress block further weapons shipments to Ukraine and forces a peace process, is that a good thing or a bad thing? Curious for the vibe check on FC. (Anyone who's followed me for a while knows where I stand.)
14 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Chris Biele ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@nfthinker
It wasn’t a hard hitting interview, but it was interesting hearing Putin discuss things like scuppered peace talks and the Nordstream pipeline debacle. I think anything that slows the perpetual war machine can only be helpful for humanity
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It somehow felt to me like Tucker *thought* he was satisfying his responsibility to be hard hitting and ask the tough questions, and didn't realize that the actual bar is like 100x higher than what he was doing.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Eylon 💨
@eylon.eth
This is just the first 45 minutes, Putin goes on and on twisting truths, and omitting critical detail. From the 2014 revolution and Ukrainian army interference, to NATO, and other important details like the Russian military downing a civilian aircraft from Ukrainian airspace https://warpcast.com/eylon.eth/0xc20e28b6
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Chris Biele ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@nfthinker
Felt like he was trying hard not to piss him off, which undermined his ability to ask difficult questions. There was some push back when it came to Evan Gershkovich, but he should have been asking about alleged war crimes. I guess it’s a fine line between respecting your guest and not getting poisoned at the airport
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
