Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
is there an onchain protocol that lets you verify ownership of multiple addresses similar to farcaster verifications?
5 replies
7 recasts
28 reactions

↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
you can do this on icebreaker by linking multiple wallets
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
is icebreaker onchain?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
I am interested in the answer for this so that icebreaker can honor and promote it for those who want it We have a way to generate a ZKP of an address that is onchain provable, but don’t actively promote verifications onchain because that is terrible privacy architecture. @sin do you know of any?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
https://warpcast.com/stephancill/0x9cdf0567
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
oh sorry @web3pm not sure that was the question you're interested in lol
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Yeah I was just wondering if there are registries already in an extensible way. Was going to separately tackle the other question of “is onchain the right place for storing verifications”. Believe that’s a strong no and the right answer involves something more like onchain witnessed verification IDs, with the underlying verifications stored elsewhere. This is what icebreaker does for email verifications using eas and witness right now
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
i'm inclined to agree. considering your strong no i didn't expect your idea of the right answer to still have an onchain component hehe
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
There’s merit to your point about uptime, availability, and permissionlessness And blockchains are a key ingredient to achieve this goal I wouldn’t believe anyone who claims to have a solution that doesn’t incorporate blockchain in some way Just think that we can achieve the best of both worlds with a more sophisticated architecture where we separate *data* from *proof of data*. The latter is onchain, and makes the former provable onchain
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
💯 🤝
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions