Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
is there an onchain protocol that lets you verify ownership of multiple addresses similar to farcaster verifications?
6 replies
7 recasts
47 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
you can do this on icebreaker by linking multiple wallets
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
is icebreaker onchain?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
I am interested in the answer for this so that icebreaker can honor and promote it for those who want it We have a way to generate a ZKP of an address that is onchain provable, but don’t actively promote verifications onchain because that is terrible privacy architecture. @sin do you know of any?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
https://warpcast.com/stephancill/0x9cdf0567
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
oh sorry @web3pm not sure that was the question you're interested in lol
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Yeah I was just wondering if there are registries already in an extensible way. Was going to separately tackle the other question of “is onchain the right place for storing verifications”. Believe that’s a strong no and the right answer involves something more like onchain witnessed verification IDs, with the underlying verifications stored elsewhere. This is what icebreaker does for email verifications using eas and witness right now
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions