giving it to someone who was awol for a long time then came to piggy back on someone else’s innovation? oh okay 🤡🤡🤡

i hope there’s a legal way to go about this, grifters

Don't need or want the fees. I'm just building a zk app, don't care for tokenomics. Fairest thing for all holders is a buy/burn, which is where it's going.

just building stuff / prev: manifold.xyz opensea.io

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

Not completely innocent. I did say I wouldn't continue working on @anoncast and would fork it into my own project if fees didn't go to the community that's actively sustaining it, rather than the one that's constantly posting down about it.

respect you and all that you’ve built and continue to build. need more high integrity builders like you in crypto.

i understand the pushback against the decision from a principles point of view, but anyone dunking on you is lame AF because it wasn’t your decision.

What a wild statement, I legit sold a good chunk of $anon right before bc I was done with all the drama, since you’ve created anon cast I’ve not only kept the rest of my bag but have doubled and triple down since. Keep killing it 🐐

Block out the haters and just keep building 🤌🏻

You’re doing the right thing with this @slokh Support you fully.

Pay for infra as you scale w/receipts and burn the rest. Or buy other memes with it and burn those lol 

I’m all for burning supply of clanker coins