giving it to someone who was awol for a long time then came to piggy back on someone else’s innovation? oh okay 🤡🤡🤡

i hope there’s a legal way to go about this, grifters

Don't need or want the fees. I'm just building a zk app, don't care for tokenomics. Fairest thing for all holders is a buy/burn, which is where it's going.

just building stuff / prev: manifold.xyz opensea.io

respect you and all that you’ve built and continue to build. need more high integrity builders like you in crypto.

i understand the pushback against the decision from a principles point of view, but anyone dunking on you is lame AF because it wasn’t your decision.

https://anoncast.org | anonymous posting for $ANON holders, powered by zk proofs | CA 0x0Db510e79909666d6dEc7f5e49370838c16D950f @anontokenbase

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

eh, i’d consider you innocent but i see why you’d say that. fwiw forking seems like it would’ve been a very reasonable path forward. harder definitely, but still reasonable.

Not completely innocent. I did say I wouldn't continue working on @anoncast and would fork it into my own project if fees didn't go to the community that's actively sustaining it, rather than the one that's constantly posting down about it.