I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right

from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume

clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading

unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal

founder /openventures | /proxyswap | tokenbot @clanker

the reason it feels misleading is that clanker volume accounts for “secondary” (unbounded) whereas pdf volume accounts only for primary (bounded somewhat, outcomes are either zero or ray)

yea I know it doesn’t, but the metric is comparing aggregate volume on any coins launched on clanker, to *just* the pdf bonding curves

doesn’t account for agg secondary volume on coins launched on pdf

Clanker doesn’t use a bonding curve I think that has been one of its main advantages over things like wowxyz, less stages to reach the open market 

I think you see right it is a apples to oranges comparison

https://open.spotify.com/track/712uvW1Vezq8WpQi38v2L9?si=8nVWGOU6R3KLImAv-wadyA

Think this is the truth.

Cause chill guy alone > vol $$$$$$

i believe this chart is a bit misleading,

i assume that in the query itself, the volume from the pumpfun's bonding curve is taken into the comparison, and while clanker doesn't have no bonding curves, it deploys to uni v3 straight ahead.

wouldn't it be fair then to include raydium volume data in the query too?

lol i just mentioned it 
https://warpcast.com/dalechyn.eth/0x530c8370