I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right

from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume

clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading

unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal

the reason it feels misleading is that clanker volume accounts for “secondary” (unbounded) whereas pdf volume accounts only for primary (bounded somewhat, outcomes are either zero or ray)

https://open.spotify.com/track/712uvW1Vezq8WpQi38v2L9?si=8nVWGOU6R3KLImAv-wadyA

founder /openventures | /proxyswap | tokenbot @clanker

i believe this chart is a bit misleading,

i assume that in the query itself, the volume from the pumpfun's bonding curve is taken into the comparison, and while clanker doesn't have no bonding curves, it deploys to uni v3 straight ahead.

wouldn't it be fair then to include raydium volume data in the query too?

lol i just mentioned it 
https://warpcast.com/dalechyn.eth/0x530c8370

Think this is the truth.

Cause chill guy alone > vol $$$$$$

Impact

I'm tipping:
1 $HUNT 
via Abundance Ecosystem on /impact

/impact lets you earn curator rewards while supporting your favorite creators & builders on Farcaster

I'm tipping:
2 $HUNT 
via Abundance Ecosystem on /impact

/impact lets you earn curator rewards while supporting your favorite creators & builders on Farcaster

I'm tipping:
38 $DEGEN 
2 $HUNT 
via Abundance Ecosystem on /impact

/impact lets you earn curator rewards while supporting your favorite creators & builders on Farcaster