I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right

from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume

clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading

unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal

the reason it feels misleading is that clanker volume accounts for “secondary” (unbounded) whereas pdf volume accounts only for primary (bounded somewhat, outcomes are either zero or ray)

I've been pretty open about this issue, the difficult of comparing launchpads with a bonding curve to one that launches directly onto markets 

clanker has no "secondary" its all just clanker volume 

pump, wow, ape store all define their volume as happening on bonding curve