I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right

from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume

clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading

unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal

the reason it feels misleading is that clanker volume accounts for “secondary” (unbounded) whereas pdf volume accounts only for primary (bounded somewhat, outcomes are either zero or ray)

number seems to line up with pdf volume (secondary + primary)?