Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ross Shuel
@shuel.eth
is it more correct to view an efficient prediction market as a mechanism to provide accurate probabilities for outcomes, rather than predicting binary outcomes? e.g. prediction markets correctly assigned Trump a <50% probability of winning the 2016 election.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ross Shuel
@shuel.eth
And if so, what is the implication for conditional markets i.e. futarchy? @nicovrg
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nicovrg (fut/acc)
@nicovrg
to me prediction markets have an evaluation "resolution" that reward people who were right whereas conditional market protect holders & allow them to express their desire depending of proposal result example ->
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ross Shuel
@shuel.eth
Hmm. This makes sense but doesn’t answer the question I’m trying to articulate Another way stating this: should we expect conditional markets to “get it wrong” some % of the time? If so, is there a correlation between the pass v. fail market prices and the probability the “worse” proposal passes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicovrg (fut/acc)
@nicovrg
there might be some keynesian beauty contest in the sense that people trading conditional markets try to predict what other traders are going to trade. you can think that a proposal is -ev (should bid fail) and bid pass because you assume other traders will view it as +ev or do the same assumption as you
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction