Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sassal.eth 🎩⛽ pfp
Sassal.eth 🎩⛽
@sassal.eth
I am against: Tinkering with blobs in order to try and extract more L1 fees out of rollups. I am for: Improving the blob fee market to make it more reactive to changes in demand and reduce the lagtime to price discovery. Let the blobs do their job of scaling Ethereum!
12 replies
17 recasts
92 reactions

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
raising blob prices is pure cope — if it doesn’t come at cost for the validators it should be as cheap as possible
4 replies
4 recasts
26 reactions

Jack pfp
Jack
@jackten
I don't think increasing blob fees is a good idea at all. The idea is to incentivise usage, not extract value. We need to accept that there's just no demand because L2s and crypto generally have not found product market fit. Work on getting more users, not extracting value from the few users we have today
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Where did this debate originate? Who was suggesting to change anything about the blobs now?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

growthepie.xyz 🥧📏 pfp
growthepie.xyz 🥧📏
@growthepie
👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Frank pfp
Frank
@deboboy
L1 fees should have been and should always be zero
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Tokenized blob space futures markets.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
ATM we should just let the L2 ecosystem grow. In the long term, maybe targeting blob number with gas usage (i.e. max blob count goes up/down when blob gas is </> X gwei).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Speakup 🎩🔮 🪔 pfp
Speakup 🎩🔮 🪔
@speakup
I'm tipping: 45 $DEGEN via Abundance Ecosystem on /impact /impact lets you earn curator rewards while supporting your favorite creators & builders on Farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Impact App pfp
Impact App
@impactbot
@sassal.eth has been nominated by @manuelibup to the Abundance Ecosystem on /impact Help support @manuelibup's nominees:
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pa7x1 pfp
pa7x1
@pa7x1
EIP-1559 pricing mechanism has a quirk where the regime of demand below supply is priced essentially at 0 (1 Wei in fact). This is quite extreme. It should be cheap to entice demand but not necessarily 0.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

CryptoPlaza🎩Ⓜ️💜 OG449 pfp
CryptoPlaza🎩Ⓜ️💜 OG449
@especulacion
It's an interesting debate: If fees ultimately become a marginal part of Ethereum's demand, what remains is the monetary premium. In the end, staking profitability will require demand to absorb this issuance. I think another topic to debate is the Computation-based fee model vs. the Financial fee model. https://mirror.xyz/0x3e0cf03f718520F30300266dcF4DB50bA12d3331/OjNoFOc66rvAmfd2HBSThf_Xg1Dc-L7ba8w8p-f6QdE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴 pfp
highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴
@highplains66
Agreed Nice to see you on Warpcaster :) Hope youre having a great trip bro!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction