Danny pfp

Danny

@mad-scientist

11 Following
58 Followers
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Sub 2 Gwei base fee. I did not see it coming.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Having no priority fee in 4844 transactions is a weird design choice. It eliminates the ability of blob producers to incentivize inclusion, as well as compete for inclusion in full blocks. What am I missing here?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
What if we link the growth in blob count target with gas price? i.e. blob target only goes up when ETH is ultrasound for >x months (and maybe can even go down?).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
In the Justin-Anatoly debate, while I mostly agreed with Justin, one important point Anatoly made is the overemphasis and fear in the Ethereum ecosystem of centralization because someone has a minor edge in the staking ecosystem. In reality, whales threw away 10% just to not run their own nodes (1/2)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Hey @sassal.eth, you can come back from your secret mission now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
2 Gwei. That's a number I was not expecting to see again.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
There's a bug in polymarket that sometimes makes any market appear to have 50% (disappears on refresh). I don't know if I like this bug or not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
An airdrop, but first everyone brings (zk) proofs of what they did in the ecosystem, and then the criteria are revealed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
@dwr.eth @support I was using farcaster on a friends computer (we don't follow each other), and some of my replies to other users weren't visible to him. Any idea why? (I'm fairly sure he did not block me :-)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Is there a document (csv/other) with the eligible eigenlayer addresses?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
https://early-or-late.fly.dev/fid/20455
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Am I the only one with an urge to do something on L1 when gas is single-digit?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Something I don't understand about the Liquity protocol: why not prevent trove redemption by having a managed low-collateral-ratio trove? It's profitable and keeps everyone else safe from having to worry about it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Something feels a bit off about having a list of (mostly) home stakers. Someone should figure out a way to do zk channels.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Could someone please update Consensys that minting "free" NFT's celebrating what is mostly a L2 upgrade should be optionally done on, well, L2s?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
a wise man once said it should't cost >5 cents to send value over the internet.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Who should be included in all airdrops: 1. Core devs/Protocol guild 2. Home stakers +1 staking prior to merge +2 staking for genesis +3 minority client +4 proposing their own blocks (i.e. not 100% MEV boost use)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Shill me the coolest low-cap projects
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Negative staking rate will push the out the Ethereum-aligned risk-minimizing stakers first. Issuance should go down (not just APY, but absolute numbers as well) at higher staking rates, but never go negative.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danny pfp
Danny
@mad-scientist
Unpopular opinion - the EigenLayer point system is horrible. Points are linear in time and stake, so individuals who got in early in relatively small size, and now being "diluted" by pools who came in late but at size. So if someone sat out 9 months, and came in with 10X of the pool capital for one month, he gets 50%.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction