I do not understand why Brantly and Esk3nder are picking this fight with @dwr.ethth and @v 

Farcaster is one of the more successful projects to leverage ENS. Instead of critiquing how "ENS-aligned" FC is, perhaps it would be better for the ENS team to reflect on the limitations of ENS that Farcaster had to overcome.

there's some confusion around farcaster names, so let me clear this up: 

- your username on farcaster is ALWAYS an ENS name
- one kind of ens name is the farcaster name (v.farcaster.eth shown in client as @v)  
- the other kind of ens name is the L1 name (dwr.eth shown in client as @dwr.eth)

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Dumb question perhaps.. but does that mean that sending money to the address dwr.farcaster.eth directs it to the primary eth wallet linked to the FC account the same way sending money to dwr.eth would link to an associated ETH address using ENS?

Building Higher apparel at High Line 🧢 
Host at /clickcast /cpg || Husband to @shiwen

Not currently but something we would like to do!

Glad to hear this. Wallet is cool, sure it opens surface area and probably part of why the name thing is also coming up. I don’t want to create more fragmentation I want simplicity as a user and everything to connect.