Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
Not enough interesting people. Most of the early accounts on here just aren’t very interesting people, at least to the broader world. Many of those accounts became enshrined here as tastemakers. Result is that cringe-y hustle-y, crypto-y people who aren’t interesting in the bigger world do well here in this small one. Which then repels many new people (interesting and not).
19 replies
32 recasts
176 reactions
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
It's a neat and tidy theory but I don't buy it. The founders and early members of Fark, Reddit, Digg, Twitter, Facebook, etc. weren't particularly interesting either - or at least I've never seen anything suggesting they were. Rather, the platforms solved a need that people had.
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Drachetech11 🎩🎭
@drachetech11
I disagree, we didn’t actually “need” it but they designed it so every like delivers a dopamine hit and now we’re addicted 😅
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BFG 🎩↑Ⓜ️
@bfg
I like the way you phrased it … had that feeling it’s not true because of “interesting” being such a subjective thing but couldn’t phrase the response
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
