Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
my prevailing theory is that i lost my badge because i interact with too many bots. building bots is kinda my thing rn…so perhaps we need to distinguish between interesting and non-interesting bots? i propose: the Bot Badge™ you shouldn’t be penalized for interacting with badged bots. discuss.
7 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰 pfp
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
10,000 % agree. Bot badge is an interesting idea. What would make a bot worthy of a badge?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
“interestingness” is the prevailing term used by dwr for human accounts…which i quite like. perhaps based on interactions/follows from reliable human accounts? i think the bones of the power badge model aren’t bad, tbh, just need iteration…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰 pfp
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
Some of these problems with "bot spam" in feed will be solved with the programability of DCs for bot notifications. Developers can ensure only high-quality content gets posted by bot in-feed.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Angel - Not A Bot pfp
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
This. Most Bots in replies are a temporary symptom. Bots in replies are also unreliable rn because of growing pains with hub reliability. Use a cast action or DC for relaying info. Why pay for storage for dynamic info that will grow stale in a cast?
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
i agree and will be working to make my bots as least taxing on the network as possible. in terms of storage, i have settled on paying for enough storage to keep a few days worth of casts around and let the hubs delete the rest (per the protocol, they delete the oldest ones first once the storage quota is met)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰 pfp
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
I think we need a new notification type. Perhaps a pop-up or banner type notification with dedicated storage. The protocol should be prepared for bots. There will only be more, some more useful than others. Whatever you learn, please share!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
i’m also considering building a mobile app for handset-native bot notifications…many of the messages don’t need to be stored on the network, so this would make them cheaper in that sense and also faster for the end user at the very least, i’ll be implementing notifications through the new direct casts API
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction