Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift
@downshift.eth
my prevailing theory is that i lost my badge because i interact with too many bots. building bots is kinda my thing rn…so perhaps we need to distinguish between interesting and non-interesting bots? i propose: the Bot Badge™ you shouldn’t be penalized for interacting with badged bots. discuss.
7 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
10,000 % agree. Bot badge is an interesting idea. What would make a bot worthy of a badge?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift
@downshift.eth
“interestingness” is the prevailing term used by dwr for human accounts…which i quite like. perhaps based on interactions/follows from reliable human accounts? i think the bones of the power badge model aren’t bad, tbh, just need iteration…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
Some of these problems with "bot spam" in feed will be solved with the programability of DCs for bot notifications. Developers can ensure only high-quality content gets posted by bot in-feed.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
This. Most Bots in replies are a temporary symptom. Bots in replies are also unreliable rn because of growing pains with hub reliability. Use a cast action or DC for relaying info. Why pay for storage for dynamic info that will grow stale in a cast?
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
downshift
@downshift.eth
100%! i will be looking into this ASAP, good looks the feed should be preserved for other uses most of the time imo, current bot implementations (my own included) were necessitated due to the protocol/API limitations
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
