Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift ⚡️🌲
@downshift.eth
my prevailing theory is that i lost my badge because i interact with too many bots. building bots is kinda my thing rn…so perhaps we need to distinguish between interesting and non-interesting bots? i propose: the Bot Badge™ you shouldn’t be penalized for interacting with badged bots. discuss.
7 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
@edit builds a ton of bots as well though
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tombornal
@tombornal
yep, just as there are good and bad human casters, there are good and bad bot casters
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sine
@sinusoidalsnail
And/or something similar to a journalist’s press pass. Like, a bot interaction pass that could be applied for.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tylerperrystein ❖
@tylerperrystein
im gonna go from rank 80 to 2k in a week fk it 350 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
I think ultimately we’ll see channel tools that allow you to choose which specific bots you allow and don’t. Goodness varies for a bot depending on context. A ham bot is probably beloved by /lp but I might not want any ham mentions in say /books Relevant thread: https://warpcast.com/brennan/0x35f5145e
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
10,000 % agree. Bot badge is an interesting idea. What would make a bot worthy of a badge?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joely 🎩🏰
@joely
This is a great idea! Recast to help get more eyes on it for you 👀 🤖
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
