Ethereum

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

And I thought the magic number was 65k. 

I mean is not even a scale issue all those EVM chains measured on l2 beat probably could go well over 2k is just a lack of activity.

Plus for me, l2s are not a neat scale solution, with the state all over and infrastructure mainly run by a handful of private companies, but alas, fees of 0.001$ are better than a global state.

Software developer, open source enthusiast, privacy advocate.

Clear Wallet Open-source privacy focused wallet: https://clear-wallet.flashsoft.eu/


it's a specific number where i expect certain issues to arise in the current state of affairs for the L2s, i don't see 65k happening any time soon.

purely in terms of theoreticals (assuming the expectations are surpassed) if max OP fork L2 saturation were possible with the theorised gigagas target, the max would be: 47,619 (max of cheapest txs possible under a gigagas block) / 2 (2s block time) * 6 (max number of gigagas OP fork L2s, assuming this can even fit six of these full blocks consistently in a blob sidecar (they cannot)) = 142,857 TPS

Won't PeerDAS increase effective blob capacity by another 6x or so?
It removes the bottleneck that every node needs to download every blob.