Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
my two cents and in-good-faith interpretation of "not enough interesting content": @dwr.eth DOES NOT mean that current users aren't interesting enough @dwr.eth DOES mean that there are not enough of us so that the supply of interesting content on warpcast simply cannot compete with the supply on other platforms
34 replies
152 recasts
383 reactions
Pichi ๐ช๐๐น๐ฉ ๐ก๐ธ
@pichi
I hope this is the correct interpretation. It feels shitty to see this rhetoric over and over when so many of us are trying our best.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
tknox.eth๐ช๐ฉ
@thompson
seriously. its super frustrating & at the same time insulting -- especially when most of us spend all of our time here
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
it isnโt intended to be an insult to the users, but to the network and its growth (so more of a self-critique). even if every cast here is a banger โ 100% bangers โ it would still only be a fraction of twitterโs bangers based on volume alone. itโs a nuanced take that needs more specificity, as admitted.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi ๐ช๐๐น๐ฉ ๐ก๐ธ
@pichi
We should make a poll and see how people feel. I think youโd be surprised how many people read this comment, and the many more before it, as an insult to the user base, not the product.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
is it more productive to: 1. gauge feelings based on the (inaccurate) interpretation of a poorly worded statement (which we know are negative) OR 2. clarify and better word the statement so it accurately reflects the intent and then see how people feel?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tknox.eth๐ช๐ฉ
@thompson
the poll is quite interestingโ i think it gauges legit sentimentโ and they really should listen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction