Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
my two cents and in-good-faith interpretation of "not enough interesting content": @dwr.eth DOES NOT mean that current users aren't interesting enough @dwr.eth DOES mean that there are not enough of us so that the supply of interesting content on warpcast simply cannot compete with the supply on other platforms
35 replies
207 recasts
549 reactions

Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸 pfp
Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸
@pichi
I hope this is the correct interpretation. It feels shitty to see this rhetoric over and over when so many of us are trying our best.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

tknox.ethπŸŸͺ🎩 pfp
tknox.ethπŸŸͺ🎩
@thompson
seriously. its super frustrating & at the same time insulting -- especially when most of us spend all of our time here
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
it isn’t intended to be an insult to the users, but to the network and its growth (so more of a self-critique). even if every cast here is a banger β€” 100% bangers β€” it would still only be a fraction of twitter’s bangers based on volume alone. it’s a nuanced take that needs more specificity, as admitted.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸 pfp
Pichi πŸŸͺπŸ–πŸΉπŸŽ© 🍑🌸
@pichi
I don’t think a lot of folks realize how this comes off as text without context. Very wowow.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction