Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower? If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.

7 replies

4 recasts

23 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

I see this consistently. Warpcast vs Airstack What grinds my gears is this community is hypersub gated. Bots don’t buy hypersubs. But about half my subscribers comments don’t make the cut.

5 replies

0 recast

9 reactions

C O M P Ξ Z pfp

There is a huge difference in the number of likes and recasts. I think WC ignores a lot of real stuff.

2 replies

0 recast

7 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

Yeah. That’s 50%. This isn’t some margin of error.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

Only way out of this: pluggable algorithms with complete transparency. Do most users care? No. But the content producers do, and that's always been a 1:100x ratio and I think it's an opportunity to do better...

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

My priorities are: see the members of my community always then see less spam. If most people here are spam, that’s a huge issue that needs to be solved.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

I think spam is fine if we can reliably filter it out... and that's a solved problem, we just have to give communities the tools to do it. Unfortunately it seems like it's a bit muddled IMO: channels get moderation, but also get the spam filtering. My view is channels should be 100% community-moderated, and leave the spam filtering of channels to the mods.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x8b0b4c82

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩

Yeah I'm not sure I understand the logic. Determining who sees what in a channel is moderation *policy*, not a protocol concern. It would make more sense to me to support invites at a protocol level, but decide what to do with "invite status" (invited vs. not invited) at a moderator level. Maybe I'm missing something.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

I’m waiting to read the spec. As always, I will just build around it. But most people won’t.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions