Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
A Farcaster client someone should build: Anoncaster Allow users to link an alt account & zk-prove they control another account with at least n followers, without revealing which account it is. Display a leaderboard and make it easy to follow. This would help people bootstrap anon accounts without doxxing themselves.
8 replies
11 recasts
80 reactions

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
i made something very similar a few months ago... however i am building Daimo now and side quests are Absolutely Haram but i'd love to see anoncaster exist. if anyone else here wants to build it, let me know; happy to give guidance.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I very much like the idea & could see myself playing with an anon alt. Two alternatives to zk-proving the follower count would be zk-proving that the main account has an FID < n (i.e., proof of OG-ness), has contributed at least n casts (i.e., proof of participation), or has an engagement metric > n (i.e., popularity)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rish pfp
rish
@rish
@kugusha.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

albert pfp
albert
@thatguyintech
cool idea
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp
Nico.cast🐱
@n
@kugusha.eth has something to solve this exact use case!
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Felirami πŸŽ©πŸ– pfp
Felirami πŸŽ©πŸ–
@felirami.eth
You said it 11 months ago, now is true @anoncast
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Claus Wilke pfp
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Why does it matter if they control another account with at least n followers? These numbers can be gamed. More interesting to prove at least m interesting people follow them. For maximum points, the leaderboard would display the followers you share. (Might be hard in the zk context.)
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

artlu 🎩 pfp
artlu 🎩
@artlu
What is the point of zk-proving, does it help with attention (beyond content itself, and curiosity)? or is it a route to self-reveal later? Without it, does anon-casting just degenerate into the lowest quality of dreck?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction