Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
tfw /nouns-retro is filled with funded builders executing their proposals. nouns-retro should be reserved for unfunded proliferation imo I get that farming $nouns in /nouns isn't as rewarding but cmon @seneca maybe we need some parameters established and enforced by moderators?
7 replies
3 recasts
32 reactions

Bixbite 👽  pfp
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
I agree, there is a prop dates channel for proposal updates …. I thought this channel was for new Nounish things being done that are currently unfunded…. If not it just feels like double dipping.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Mfer Ones 🎩🔵 pfp
Mfer Ones 🎩🔵
@mferones
Is mine good enough for the retro?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
https://warpcast.com/frog/0x221085fe https://warpcast.com/frog/0x0c9d55ab
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
i feel this -- i usually make a point of not posting camp stuff in /nouns-retro _unless_ its something we consider a side-thing maybe i post in /nouns though bc i think it makes sense to highlight new features etc, but i could see why it rubs ppl wrong there too
5 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Fattybuthappy pfp
Fattybuthappy
@fattybuthappy
Definetly makes it hard to be competitive with prop funded budget that has payout and recast for exitment of update
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
not happy about it either. Find it unfair
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

DAsha pfp
DAsha
@tuta2001
You’re on it! 💪
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction