Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
tfw /nouns-retro is filled with funded builders executing their proposals. nouns-retro should be reserved for unfunded proliferation imo I get that farming $nouns in /nouns isn't as rewarding but cmon @seneca maybe we need some parameters established and enforced by moderators?
7 replies
3 recasts
32 reactions
krel
@krel
i feel this -- i usually make a point of not posting camp stuff in /nouns-retro _unless_ its something we consider a side-thing maybe i post in /nouns though bc i think it makes sense to highlight new features etc, but i could see why it rubs ppl wrong there too
5 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
krel
@krel
on the other hand, if it acts as a driver to get ppl to post/share/document their props its not the worst and a small cost lots of ifs but just being mindful there is an element of dont miss the forest for the trees here
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
drewcoffman
@drewcoffman.eth
i'm surprised to hear this is it explicitly written anywhere that /nouns-retro is for 'non-proposers'? and even if it was…why? isn't the point to incentive people to do nounish things on a regular (weekly) basis?
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
bag, chips
@indexcard.eth
posting in /nouns feels fine to me and the reward makes sense. retro always rubs me a little wrong… Like yeah, you got funded 100k+, you better have something nounish to share lol but better than never hearing anything from a proposer for sure.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Have felt it either unecessary or not good vibes to post nounish stuff in there, so I haven’t. Asking for a reward for something you’ve been paid to do 😬🤷Unless maybe something has performed exceedingly well or outside expectations or scope. I saw it more as a replacement for the OG small grants retro fund
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ テ🎩
@joshuafisher.eth
I waffle on whether you should post in /nouns-retro if you were funded to execute a prop and that’s what you’re posting about…if you’re going above and beyond or work outside the scope I think that’s prob good
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
