Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
tfw /nouns-retro is filled with funded builders executing their proposals. nouns-retro should be reserved for unfunded proliferation imo I get that farming $nouns in /nouns isn't as rewarding but cmon @seneca maybe we need some parameters established and enforced by moderators?
7 replies
3 recasts
32 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
i feel this -- i usually make a point of not posting camp stuff in /nouns-retro _unless_ its something we consider a side-thing maybe i post in /nouns though bc i think it makes sense to highlight new features etc, but i could see why it rubs ppl wrong there too
5 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Have felt it either unecessary or not good vibes to post nounish stuff in there, so I haven’t. Asking for a reward for something you’ve been paid to do 😬🤷Unless maybe something has performed exceedingly well or outside expectations or scope. I saw it more as a replacement for the OG small grants retro fund
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions