Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
tfw /nouns-retro is filled with funded builders executing their proposals. nouns-retro should be reserved for unfunded proliferation imo I get that farming $nouns in /nouns isn't as rewarding but cmon @seneca maybe we need some parameters established and enforced by moderators?
7 replies
3 recasts
32 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
i feel this -- i usually make a point of not posting camp stuff in /nouns-retro _unless_ its something we consider a side-thing maybe i post in /nouns though bc i think it makes sense to highlight new features etc, but i could see why it rubs ppl wrong there too
5 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ テ🎩 pfp
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ テ🎩
@joshuafisher.eth
I waffle on whether you should post in /nouns-retro if you were funded to execute a prop and that’s what you’re posting about…if you’re going above and beyond or work outside the scope I think that’s prob good
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions