Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
this is one of the reflections i have after trying to build consensus around $nouns for the past few weeks / months it’s just very hard which made me wonder what things you really need dao consensus for. if you need funding or you need the dao to deploy then ofc but maybe $nouns could get started without?
6 replies
3 recasts
45 reactions
Sam
@sams
The DAOs unwillingness to work together on this is making me kinda bearish ngl. I’m hopeful but I’ve definitely lost some excitement seeing the outcome of these 2 proposals. To me a “canonical” token is more about aligning attention than being official.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Sam
@sams
Of course I would love to see experimentation in this area but $nouns and $⌐◨-◨ feels functionally the same with some governance on top, something that would have paired really nicely with $nouns. People have already been confused with $nogs and $nouns I worry we won’t be able to gain momentum with all of these
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
they aren’t the same tho. one wants gov voting and fractional art from day one and one doesn’t think it’s a day one item. if this was ethereum these two props are definitely different enough to be two different eips.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sam
@sams
I know they aren’t the same, but the dev side of my brain sees the fact that $⌐◨-◨ is technically a superset of $nouns and that same outcome could be achieved if we worked together and utilized the blockchains best feature, composability. 1/2
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sams
In my mind that would be the ideal but yeah like you said decentralized things are hard to align so we got to work with what we have I guess 2/2
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
what i’m trying to say is that just bc they point to the same end state doesn’t mean that they are redundant. half of the eips if you look them up are like just different cuts of the same roadmap. ppl argue about them (rightfully) bc it embeds views about what’s minimally viable, fears about follow through, etc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sams
I see what you are saying, and I think you are right. Will be interesting to watch all of this unfold.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
