Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
this is one of the reflections i have after trying to build consensus around $nouns for the past few weeks / months it’s just very hard which made me wonder what things you really need dao consensus for. if you need funding or you need the dao to deploy then ofc but maybe $nouns could get started without?
6 replies
3 recasts
33 reactions

Sam pfp
Sam
@sams
The DAOs unwillingness to work together on this is making me kinda bearish ngl. I’m hopeful but I’ve definitely lost some excitement seeing the outcome of these 2 proposals. To me a “canonical” token is more about aligning attention than being official.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Sam pfp
Sam
@sams
Of course I would love to see experimentation in this area but $nouns and $⌐◨-◨ feels functionally the same with some governance on top, something that would have paired really nicely with $nouns. People have already been confused with $nogs and $nouns I worry we won’t be able to gain momentum with all of these
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
but maybe decentralized things are hard to align. you could never get all bitcoiners to align on what bitcoin should be. but some ppl that think it should be used as money more work on lightning and that’s a thing that moves forward by the ppl that care about that. over time more alignment emerges not all upfront
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions