Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
this is one of the reflections i have after trying to build consensus around $nouns for the past few weeks / months it’s just very hard which made me wonder what things you really need dao consensus for. if you need funding or you need the dao to deploy then ofc but maybe $nouns could get started without?
6 replies
3 recasts
33 reactions
Sam
@sams
The DAOs unwillingness to work together on this is making me kinda bearish ngl. I’m hopeful but I’ve definitely lost some excitement seeing the outcome of these 2 proposals. To me a “canonical” token is more about aligning attention than being official.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
One thing that would be helpful is a way to get a legal opinion from the foundation. I’ve asked about this for a well over a year now. Need a process for this imo. Also, some of us were already on FC but until you said “I’m going to be over there not on twitter”did /nouns take off. Leadership matters.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
leoclark.⌐◨-◨ ↑ᖽ🎩
@leoclark.eth
After the zeropod interview I thought this was so simple and straight forward that it was just a matter of implementing it... My only doubt was re the treasury Nouns. Would they all be fractionalized? Or just a portion? And how? A prop? Because for each owner, the option to split the Noun into 1M $nouns is a choice.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
willywonka 👾🎩 ⌐◨-◨
@willywonka.eth
I was thinking the DAO would kickstart the liquidity using idle nouns and eth in the treasury (which it would then generate revenue on trade fees from). To your point, community members could do it on their own, but I hear @sams point too that it feels less bullish if it’s not official.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ
@toadyhawk.eth
Maybe it could raise a 500 ETH party presale round *smoke emoji*
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Anyone can create a contract to allow Nouns to fractionalize themselves into $NOUNS, but the whole point I thought was wanting it to be canonical, which indeed would need consensus & voting…. V3 & rage quit makes $NOUNS a potential attack vector on the treasury, so I don’t think it should be done without consensus.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
